A Direct Acyclic Graph (DAG)is a type of graph in which edges have direction and cycles are not allowed. For example, a linked list like A→B→C is an instance of a DAG where A references B and so on. We say that B is a child or a descendant of A, and that node A has a link to B. Conversely A is a parent of B. We call nodes that are not children to any other node in the DAG root nodes.
A Merkle-DAG is a DAG where each node has an identifier and this is the result of hashing the node’s contents — any opaque payload carried by the node and the list of identifiers of its children — using a cryptographic hash function like SHA256. This brings some important considerations:
- Merkle-DAGs can only be constructed from the leaves, that is, from nodes without children. Parents are added after children because the children’s identifiers must be computed in advance to be able to link them.
- every node in a Merkle-DAG is the root of a (sub)Merkle-DAG itself, and this subgraph is contained in the parent DAG.
- Merkle-DAG nodes are immutable. Any change in a node would alter its identifier and thus affect all the ascendants in the DAG, essentially creating a different DAG. Take a look at this helpful illustration using bananas from our friends at Consensys.
Identifying a data object (like a Merkle-DAG node) by the value of its hash is referred to as content addressing. Thus, we name the node identifier as Content Identifier or CID.
For example, the previous linked list, assuming that the payload of eachnode is just the CID of its descendant would be: A=Hash(B)→B=Hash©→C=Hash(∅). The properties of the hash function ensure thatno cycles can exist when creating Merkle-DAGs.
Merkle-DAGs are self-verified structures. The CID of a node is univocally linked to the contents of its payload and those of all its descendants. Thus two nodes with the same CID univocally represent exactly the same DAG. This will be a key property to efficiently sync Merkle-CRDTs without having to copy the full DAG, as exploited by systems like IPFS. Merkle-DAGs are very widely used. Source control systems like Git  and others  use them to efficiently store the repository history, in away that enables de-duplicating the objects and detecting conflicts between branches.
Excerpted from Markle-CRDT draft paper by @hsanjuan, @haadcode, and @pgte. Available: https://hector.link/presentations/merkle-crdts/merkle-crdts.pdf
 Merkle-DAGs are similar to Merkle Trees  but there are no balance requirements and every node can carry a payload. In DAGs, several branches can re-converge or, in other words, a node can have several parents.
 Hash functions are one way functions. Creating a cycle should then be impossibly difficult, unless some weakness is discovered and exploited.
Was this information helpful?
Thank you for the feedback.